The term 'style' has become outdated for contemporary practice, because it implies an approach that is already obsolete. But this doesn’t mean that internal coherence is unnecessary: every architectural practice must be consistent, because it forms part of a broader field of cultural production. We are, and architecture is, entangled in pragmatic matters, which means that there is a lot that we do not control in our work. And although architects are, to some extent, problem-solvers, we cannot forget that we are also cultural producers. For me, what matters is conceptual coherence in the practice’s topics, processes, and values: a steady sensibility toward the way we relate to the world. Then, almost as a byproduct, that sensibility ends up manifesting itself in something recognizable in outputs, something like a ‘style.’ But ‘style’ is not an end in itself...[+]